Mobile technology should not be about cramming the office into your pocket but a way to enjoy your everyday life.

Pebble Time


Pebble Time arrived today, over two years after I got the original Pebble watch. During this time the software for the original Pebble matured significantly. With the new Pebble Time, the company behind the watch introduced a new "timeline" concept that is very intuitive. They also focused more on the essential services such as the watchfaces and notifications - paying less attention to apps. Experience with the previous model has shown that people don't run a large number of different apps on their watches.

The basic idear behind the timeline interface is that the watch shows "now", i.e. the watch face. With the back and forward buttons the user can check past items such as missed calls and future items such as upcoming appointments. Very intuitive and very much a focus on what is important.

Perhaps the biggest drawback with the original Pebble was how it looked. The new one looks a lot better. Even the basic "plastic" version has Gorilla glass and a metal bezel.

The main technical improvement is the e-ink screen that now comes in color. Together with a better refresh rate and better processor this also allows for nice transition animations. The colors are not eye popping but it makes a huge difference compared to the previouse monochrom display. The old watch faces for the original Pebble work on Pebble Time but they immediately look so dated compared to the new watch faces that make use of colors that you are unlikely to use them. What has not changed is the great battery life (compared to other smart watches) thanks to the e-ink screen that requires power only when pixels change. The basic Pebble Time has the same 7 day battery life as the original Pebble.

And the screen stays on all the time. The powered off black screens of Android watches and the Apple watch are in my opinion quite a sad sight.

The Pebble Time has a interface that allows for third party "smart straps" such as heart rate monitors, GPS and whatever. The idear is interesting but it remains to be seen if any meaningful straps appear on the market.

Rikomagic MK902II


I have been very happy with my Rikomagic MK902 - so happy in fact that I immediately ordered the improved "Mark II" model once it became available. Today I got it and it is living up to my expectations.

The device itself looks exactly like the old one with the exception of a small "II" added to the logo. This time they have managed to squeeze everything into an even smaller box than before and this time the box also includes a very simple IR remote control mainly for controlling media players (play, pause, stop...) The power supply is the same as before and the power cord is just as short as before.

The improved model is identical to the old one except for three components that have been upgraded:

  • CPU has been upgraded from a Rockchip 3188 to 3288
  • WiFi has been upgraded from single band to dual band (2.4/5 GHz)
  • Ethernet has been upgraded from 100 Mbps to 1 Gbps

And then there is one feature that has been removed: there is no longer an integrated video camera. The integrated camera came in handy for video conferences and Skype video calls so it is a shame this has been removed. There is a small lens at the same place that the camera used to be but in the II model it is an IR receiver window - this is probably the reason why so many blog posts and "reviews" about the new II device incorrectly claims it contains a camera.

The Ethernet and WiFi improvements are pretty straight forward, but the CPU upgrade is interesting. As far as model numbers goes, the 3188 to 3288 change might not seem like much but it is. When it comes to clock frequenzies the changes are minor aswell, the old one running at 1.6 GHz and the new one at 1.8 GHz. But then it comes to CPU core designs, there are major changes: they are both quad core CPUs but while the 3188 used ARM Cortex A9 cores (a design from 2007), the 3288 uses the Cortex A17 (an ARM design from 2014). And the change to the integrated graphics unit (GPU) is at least as major. Both processors houses four GPUs but while the old one used Mali-400 cores (ARM's simplest model), the new one uses Mali-T764 cores that are - at the time of writing - ARMs most advanced GPUs.

Rikomagick Launcher for Android 4.4.2

Unlike the original, this one comes with modified launcher, the Rikomagic launcher that gives you a "big screen" user interface more suitable for use on a TV in a living room than the default Android launcher. The "Mark II" also comes with XBMC pre installed.

MK902 MK902II
Android 4.4.2 4.4.2
CPU Quad Core 1.6 GHz
Rockchip 3188 (ARM Cortex A9)
Quad Core 1.8 GHz
Rockchip 3288 (ARM Cortex A17)
GPU Quad Core ARM Mali-400
(OpenGL ES2.0)
Quad Core ARM Mali-T764
(OpenGL ES3.0 & OpenCL 1.1)
Ethernet 100 Mbps 1 Gbps
WiFi 2.4GHz 802.11n 2.4GHz/5GHz 802.11n

All in all, the Mark II is about three times as powerful as the original MK902. And the original MK902 was pretty powerful as well. According to AnTuTu Benchmark v5.0:

MK902 MK902II
Overall 22823 37356
UX multitask 4432 5882
UX Runtime 1416 2083
RAM operation 2269 2476
RAM speed 1068 3179
CPU (multi-thread) integer 2031 2430
CPU (multi-thread) float-point 2430 3567
GPU 2D graphics [1280x672] 1514 [1920x1080] 1493
GPU 3D graphics [1280x720] 3438 [1920x1080] 11421
Storage I/O 872 837
Database I/O 650 640

The 3D graphics test is difficult to compare since the original MK902 is running at 1280x720 while the Mark II runns at Full HD 1920x1080. But even though the Mark II is running at a much higher resolution it still beats the old one significantly in 3D performance.

The box includes:

  • The MK902II device itself
  • Power supply (European model is 2,5A)
  • Simple remote control
  • HDMI cable
  • That hard to find USB-A to USB-A cable necessary for firmware upgrades
  • A composite A/V video/audio cable
  • User Manual

Yes, the package actually includes a real printed (!) paper (!) manual in color (!). And it even includes usefull things like a screenshot of Ricomagics launcher and instructions on how to switch to a "pure Android launcher".



I am probably the last kid on the block to get 4G/LTE but the speed still impresses me. Even with a not so good 3 out of 5 bars connection I get speeds way beyond "full rate ADSL" (8 Mbps downstream, 1 Mpbs upstream) and that was an impressive wired connection not that long ago. And I get it wirelessly. On a cell phone network. At a reasonable price.

Rikomagic MK902 - Quad Core Android Set-top-box

Rikomagic MK902

The Rikomagic MK902 is a quad core Android set top box for any HDMI equipped TV. The only thing it does is allow you to run Android applications on your TV - but with about a million applications available, that is no small thing.

Rikomagic (they also go by the name RKM) is a Chinese company that made the popular and much copied "Android on a stick" MK802 back in 2012 - a device that helped start the Android set-top-box market.

They have made several improved models since then and the MK902 is the latest and greatest of those models. Previous models looked like large USB memory-sticks and where designed to be inserted directly in the HDMI port of your TV, but the MK902 comes in a small desktop case similar to the Apple TV. Unfortunately, it does not come with a built in power supply like the Apple TV and instead requires an external power supply of the wall-wart type. The included European power supply (2-round-pin) seems to be of good quality and supplies 2,5A of power. The power cord is only 110 cm long and that caused some placement problems for me.

The heart of the device is a Rockchips made quad core Coretex-A9 CPU (RK3188) running at up to 1,4 GHz. The GPU is an Mali-400 MP (quad core as well I believe).
AnTuTU Benchmark gave it an overall score of 16 084, placing it just behind the Google Nexus 4 and Samsung Galaxy S3 and that is not bad.
The device came with Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean) and is Google Play compatible so installing applications is a simple as it can be. Hopefully there will be upgrades to even newer Android versions in the future.
And yes, it's rooted out of the box so thumbs up to Rikomagic for that.

Rikomagic MK902

The bigger set-top-box design of the MK902 offers some obvious advantages compared to smaller android on a stick -designs: There are four USB ports, there is an Ethernet port for wired connections, optical out for audio enthusiasts and a proper WiFi antenna that offers great reception. One really special feature is the built in camera in the front panel of the device and this is good if you want to use it for Skype or something similar. It also has Bluetooth and a Micro-SD slot.

The device does not come with any remote control of any kind in the box but it works great with any normal mouse. It is often sold bundled with some kind of "flymouse" and this is also the kind of input device that I use as it is a convenient solution for the living room. The flymouse is a motion sensitive remote control similar to a Wii -controller that you wave in the air to move the pointer on the screen. Pressing a button clicks on the screen just like tapping on that spot with your finger and it intuitively allows you to swipe by holding the button and moving the controller just as if you where swiping a touch screen with your finger.

The MK902 replaced my previous singel-core Android set-top-box that was running Android 4.0. The previous box worked great in most situations, like playing videos located on my NAS server using the "BS Play" media player application and running video streaming applications such as Netflix. It did have some problems with not running some applications (like Flickr), not displaying the video in some Flash based browser players and being too slow to play games such as Riptide.

The MK902 has no such problems. In fact, it does not have any obvious problems. The device is stable. After several days of intensive usage it has not crashed a single time, it does not get hot or any other of those small but annoying things that some Android-on-a-stick devices seem to suffer from. Video playback with BS player works with hardware decoding out-of-the-box and full-HD playback of MPEG4 files works without a hitch.

And Riptide GP2 looks good. The Mali 400 GPU is certainly not cutting edge anymore and perhaps the weakest point of the device, but for casual gamers like me that does not expect Playstation 4 graphics, it's quite alright. I actually bought a Logitech F701 wireless gamepad to use the MK902 as a simple gaming console since I anyway have it connected to the TV and the games are so cheap compared to actual console games. While Riptide GP2 works great with the controller, there are not that many others that do. This is a shame and hopefully it will change as more people are playing Android games with devices that do not have touch screens.

I am personally not a fan of XBMC as I think it suffers from "too much UI" but I realize many like it and are considering Android set-top-boxes specifically for running XBMC. Interestingly enough, the MK902 comes in a box with an XBMC logo, suggesting the MK902 is a suitable device for such use. I tried XBMC v12.3 "Frodo" as it was the latest stable release downloaded from the official site. It works, but it does not seem to make use of hardware acceleration for video decoding as full HD playback "stutters". I also tried a nightly build of version 13 "Gotham" (20140119) and it worked with some HD files but not with all. There are other XBMC ports out there specifically tweaked to use hardware decoding on different Android set-top-boxes but I have not tried any of those.

For the time being I'm sticking with BS Player as it makes use of hardware decoding and has played everything I have thrown at it without any problem.

Got Pebble!

It is not the most stylish watch out there - far from it. But beyond that, it's actually a pretty good smart watch. The real question is how long it will take before it becomes outdated by something better. The grayscale display and the wide bezel will eventually look as '70s as the general shape of the watch already does. But for the time being, this is almost certainly the best smart watch there is.

The e-paper display really works. It's easy to read in everything from bright sunlight to dim indoor settings. And just flick your wrist to turn on the backlight if you are in a very dark environment - a simple but ingenious feature. The watch itself is light and comfortable to wear and it's all easy to set up and get working, at least with an iPhone.

There is not that much functionality yet. There are a few different watch faces but none of the analog alternatives look very nice. The text version is my favorite with a nice typography and clever animations. The music integration is simple but works well, allowing you to see basic information about what is playing and to control the music with the buttons on the watch. Caller ID is also nice, especially now in the winter time when I can easily see who's calling without having to completely take of my gloves and start digging the phone out from underneath layers of clothing. Similarly, it can display notifications about SMS and e-mail messages.

I am actually a bit excited to see what future software updates and additional add-on applications will bring - and disappointed that the SDK is still missing and few software improvements have been released. The Runkeeper integration, for example, was demonstrated some time ago but is still missing.

This is my first Kickstarter experience and despite the delay, it has been a positive and insightful experience to follow the Pebble as it went from an idea to an actual watch on my wrist.

And how could you resist a watch that not only shows the time but also its own uptime.

Budget Android brain for your dumb TV


The "A-Link SmartTV" box is one of many low price Android devices on the market now intended to be connected to your TV. Some are even shaped like USB memory sticks but instead of a USB connector at the end they have a HDMI connector, allowing you to just attache your Android device to the back of your TV.

These devices uses an unmodified, generic version of Android. The A-Link uses Android 4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich) and it still has all the "Flight Mode" and "Ring Tone" options under settings. Although the user interface has not been modified in any way for use on a large screen TV, it works surprisingly well. The main challenge concerns controlling the device as it lacks a touch screen but there are several Chinese "Air Mouse" devices on the market that works a bit like a Wii controller using a built in gyroscope. Typically, these controllers also include a tiny qwerty keyboard.

The A-Link looks like a traditional set-top-device and comes with an 850 MHz Cortex A9 single core CPU and a Mali 400MP single core GPU. It also has 4GB of flash memory for storage. It is Google Play compatible so installing applications is very simple. Software such as Angry Birds, Google Maps and Chrome works very well. Other applications that are supposed to be compatible don't even start, such as Youtube and Flickr.

I have personally used different set-top-boxes as media players in the living room, showing media files from a NAS Samba/Cifs mount. So how does this cheap Android box stack up agains for example the Xtreamer Sidewinder 2 that I have most recently used?

Quite well. The Xtreamer is a dedicated media player and does what it does very well - but it is plagued by OS bugs that crashes the whole device all to frequently and makes using it a slow and "nerdy" experience. Since the A-Link uses Android, the OS is feature rich, polished and quite user friendly - making for a far more pleasant experience.

The A-Link's capability as a media player depends entirely on the media player software you chose. The BSplayer is a capable and easy to use player that can play movies from remote Samba mounts. Unfortunately the BSplayer can not make use of hardware accelerated video decoding when playing files over Samba mounts, only when playing files from local storage such as an SD card. Since the A-Link is "rooted", it is possible to use the application CifsManager to create a Samba mount to the NAS on the operating system level and then use BSplayer or any other player to open the remote files as if they where local. This is not a good or user friendly solution, but it works very well and the device is capable of playing full HD h264 compressed video. Without hardware acceleration or video decoding, the CPU struggles to play back even the simplest h264 encoded SD video and drops quite a lot of frames.

Eye-Fi cards' write speed comparison

Eye-Fi cards write speed comparison

I have never paid much attention to SD cards' write speeds as they have always been fast enough for me. Today, however, I tried recording HD video with my new Canon S100 and my old Eye-Fi Explorer card and the camera shut down the recording after 40 seconds. The camera buffer had filled up and the card was not writing the data fast enough.

I know the newest "Pro X2" is advertised as a "Class 6" card and both the "Pro" and "Pro X2" are handling HD video without problems in two other cameras, but I had no idea how much faster the "Pro X2" is compared to the old cards. With four cameras in the house and four Eye-Fi cards I did not want to buy a fifth card without having some hard facts to base my purchasing decision on.

Well, that might not be entirely true, but since I could get some hard evidence before buying, I decided to do a test.

Write speeds for the different Eye-Fi cards:

Classic: 1.8 MB/s
Explorer: 1.8 MB/s
Pro: 4.2 MB/s
Pro X2: 12.2 MB/s

The test was done with the OSX application "Blackmagic Disk Speed Test" on an iMac using the built in SD card reader. I used a 1GB test file as that is the smallest file this application can use for testing.

Read speeds are not as important and the results where all over the chart:

Read speeds for the different Eye-Fi cards:

Classic: 14.0 MB/s
Explorer: 12.5 MB/s
Pro: 18.7 MB/s
Pro X2: 15.5 MB/s

All in all, the original Eye-Fi cards are slow and the old Pro card is not very fast either. Looks like I am going to have to get myself one more Pro X2 card after all.

The modern camera

Sony NEX-5N

It is like a digital SLR camera but tiny. You'we got the same big 24x16mm sensor that catches a lot of light and can create photos with a short depth-of-field. And you'we got the interchangeable lenses. But you don't have the bulk.

My first SLR was a Nikon F90 (N90 for those of you who haven't gone metric yet) and I'we bought a fair amount of lenses and stuff over the years. I was about to upgrade my Nikon DSLR - an aging D70s - when I realized most of my stuff was outdated. I have always felt locked in by my original choice and now I had a great opportunity to switch.

After some research I came to the conclusion that a mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses made sens. And since I wanted the biggest sensor size possible, the brand new Sony NEX-5N looked like the best option.

It does everything a big, black DSLR does - except draw attention. But it does fit in the pocket of your jacket. It's great.

But I do kind of miss the "attention" part.

Simply Apple

Apple vs Others

Two media players' remotes; on the left for an Apple TV and on the right for an Xtreamer SideWinder 2.

Although both players do very much the same thing, the difference in usability is enormous and well illustrated by the difference between the two remote controls.

In all fairness, the Xtreamer has more features but some are simply needed to make up for other shortcomings such as dedicated buttons for adjusting subtitles that are out of sync.

When comparing Apple and Xtreamer - two extremes when it comes to usability - it becomes very clear that Apple's "secret" is simplicity and nothing else.

I have sometimes heard claims that Apple's products are popular because they have nice graphics and eye candy. That argument does not stand up to scrutiny. The Xtreamer GUI is stuffed with eye candy - probably in a failed attempt at improving the user experience - and in comparison the Apple TV looks very spartan and the lack of eye candy is striking.

The Apple TV is simply uncomplicated.

Saving Nokia

Nokia 3510

Nokia should drop both Symbian and MeeGo and instead adopt Windows Phone and Android. But with a twist.

Symbian has been outdated for years and MeeGo is going to be like trying to mix two operating systems together: a huge mess. Nokia should have bought Palm before HP did and used WebOS but they missed that boat. I am sure Nokia has tried hard to write a new, purpose built operating system from scratch but obviously they have failed.

Some 20 years ago Apple tried very hard to update their MacOS operating system when it was outdated and they failed again and again. Only at the verge of bankruptcy did they decide to buy an existing operating system from an outside company and use that. They bought NeXT and that is now know as OS X and iOS. Not a bad move. Taking a ready made OS eliminates so many risks related to software projects like not knowing when it will be ready, how expensive it will be and will it even work.

There are only two alternatives for Nokia: Android and Windows Phone.

Nokia can not and should not simply move to Android like their competitors. Nokia has avoided Android because they would loose control of the important part: the ecosystem surrounding the phones. Nokia would simply be a maker of cheap hardware and forced to sell at razor thin margins to compete with all the other companies also selling phones with the same Android OS. HTC, Samsung and the other Android makers are selling a lot of phones but at such thin margins that it almost makes no sense.

And that is exactly why Nokia should adopt Android - but only for a few handsets and under a different brand. Nokia could bring out their old brand Mobira and start manufacturing a few phone models under the Mobira brand with Android. They should make it clear that Mobira is part of Nokia (Mobira by Nokia) but still keep enough distance between the brands not to make Nokia Actual seem like an Android company.

Nokia should use their current position as the worlds largets handset maker to mass produce these Mobira Android phones as prices that would eat away those already thin margins of other Android makers. Nokia would make Android handsets simply to keep up their own volumes and ruin the party for all other Android makers. This would force HTC, Samsung and all other Android makers to lose market shares.

Nokia Actual should make an exclusive deal with Microsoft to use Windows Phone 7 in Nokia's phones. An exclusive deal should be possible because Microsoft must be desperate with such a small market share and teaming up with Nokia would easily tenfold Windows Phone's market share. This way, Nokia would have their own OS and ecosystem that no other handset maker would share and Nokia could keep far higher profit margins than any Android phone manufacturer.

There is one problem, however: Windows Phone 7 only runs on high-end phones and Nokia sells a lot of cheaper phones that do not meet the hardware requirements for WP7. Microsoft could make a "light" version for Nokias low-end phones and sell 75 million such phones in a year making it worth the trouble. Alternatively Nokia could simply drop the low-end market that brings in little profit and focus on the high-end market only.


Subscribe to RSS